NANO Prop · Rule operations
Find the rule that changes the decision.
Skip the generic policy lecture. Enter how you actually run accounts and get the conflicts, gates and unknowns worth checking before you buy or trade the next session.
Evaluation account or funded account?
Learn the consistency math Optional lesson + manual calculator
Read the denominator before you change your risk.
Largest green day ÷ cycle net profit is compared with the exact product’s published cap and boundary wording.
- Largest day
- $1,200
- Cycle net
- $3,000
- Current share
- 40%
$1,200 ÷ 20% = $6,000 required cycle net. With $3,000 logged, the ratio-only gap is $3,000.
Why a red day can move the payout farther away
A $500 loss cuts cycle net to $2,500 while the $1,200 largest day stays put. The share rises to 48%, and the same ratio now needs $3,500 more net profit. If a later green day becomes the new largest day, the required total can rise again.
This is not a cue to chase the gap. The arithmetic cannot safely turn that gap into a trade size or a fixed number of days. On the sourced examples below, exceeding the cap leaves the payout gate unmet; it is not an instant account failure.
Run the ratio with your own numbers Nothing saved
Use one currency and the firm’s own cycle ledger. This manual result does not identify the product, payout number, reset event, commission basis or whether the firm has approved a payout.
Rule sheet reviewed 2026-06-23. Read from each firm's official help center via domain-restricted search (their pages block direct fetch). Open the firm's live terms before relying on any flag; rules change and some specifics are dated. A consistency rule may raise an evaluation target or delay a payout depending on the product and phase; it is not treated here as an instant account failure.
